Medical Malpractice

A beacon of hope in the complex realm of medical negligence. Entrust us with your journey to justice, and together, we shall prevail.

Seeking Justice and Healing: Navigating Birth Trauma and Medical Negligence

- Posted in Medical Malpractice by

enter image description here

Seeking Justice and Healing: Navigating Birth Trauma and Medical Negligence


The arrival of a new life is a time brimming with limitless optimism and eager expectation. Nonetheless, certain families find their excitement dampened by the troubling aftermath of birth trauma, a result of medical negligence casting a shadow over the joy of childbirth.


The arrival of a new child should evoke celebration, yet for specific families, it transforms into a path characterized by unanticipated trials. Birth trauma encompasses the physical injuries that might unfold during childbirth, frequently attributable to medical blunders or insufficient care administered by medical practitioners. These injuries possess the potential to create prolonged repercussions in the lives of both the child and their family, resulting in persistent physical, emotional, and financial challenges.


When confronted with birth trauma stemming from medical negligence, embarking on a legal course of action becomes an essential stride in the path towards justice. The endeavour to secure compensation for the suffering endured by both the mother and child due to medical negligence extends beyond mere financial recompense; it is a means of ensuring that those responsible are held accountable for their deeds.


Birth trauma encompasses an extensive array of injuries that newborns can undergo throughout the process of childbirth. These injuries are diverse, ranging from fractures and nerve damage to brain injuries and beyond. Often, these complications stem from a variety of errors, including the improper utilization of medical instruments, insufficient monitoring, untimely implementation of necessary interventions, or a failure to promptly address warning signs. In instances where medical practitioners deviate from the expected standards of care, these injuries can have far-reaching consequences that influence a child's life trajectory and impose substantial burdens on both the child and their family.


Medical negligence materializes when healthcare providers neglect to uphold the acknowledged standard of care, resulting in harm to the patient. In the specific context of birth trauma, instances of medical negligence can manifest at numerous junctures, spanning the spectrum from prenatal care to postnatal care. Within this scope, a comprehensive array of medical professionals, including obstetricians, midwives, nurses, anaesthesiologists, and other vital members of the medical team participating in the birthing journey, may all contribute to such cases. These instances of negligence can encompass misjudgements, errors in medical interventions, insufficient monitoring, and neglecting established protocols, collectively having the potential to profoundly impact both the immediate health of the newborn and the long-term well-being of both the child and their family.


Constructing a case for medical negligence demands the establishment of several pivotal components, each contributing to the comprehensive evaluation of the situation:

Duty of Care: In the realm of childbirth, healthcare providers bear the responsibility to administer competent and rational care rooted in recognized medical standards, extending this duty to encompass both the well-being of the mother and the child.

Breach of Duty: The crux of medical negligence surfaces when a healthcare provider falters in meeting the anticipated standard of care, veering away from established medical protocols and accepted practices.

Causation: Central to the argument is the requirement to substantiate that the breach of duty holds a direct link or significant contribution to the occurrence of birth trauma. This entails demonstrating that the injuries would not have arisen in the absence of the negligence in question.

Damages: Integral to the case's foundation is the presentation of tangible consequences resulting from the birth trauma. These consequences span across physical, emotional, and financial spheres, encompassing not only immediate medical expenses and ongoing treatment costs, but also the enduring toll of pain and suffering. Additionally, the diminished quality of life experienced by both the child and their family as a consequence of the trauma forms a crucial element in determining the extent of damages.

Collectively, the interplay of these elements constructs a comprehensive narrative essential to substantiating a claim of medical negligence in cases of birth trauma.


Birth trauma exhibits itself in a myriad of manifestations, each presenting distinct challenges that echo across the spectrum of medical and emotional repercussions. These diverse forms encompass a range of complexities, from head injuries stemming from the improper utilization of medical instruments to brachial plexus injuries arising from the intricacies of difficult deliveries. The enduring impacts of these injuries resonate deeply within the child's well-being, transcending the immediate context of childbirth to influence their developmental trajectory, quality of life, and overall health outlook. The multifaceted nature of birth trauma underscores the critical importance of meticulous and comprehensive healthcare practices during the birthing process, in order to safeguard against these potentially life-altering consequences.


Families impacted by the complexities of birth trauma possess the inherent right to initiate legal proceedings, aiming to attain due compensation for the multitude of losses endured. The pursuit of a personal injury claim emerges as a critical avenue through which these families can navigate the challenging aftermath, striving to secure not only financial solace but also a measure of justice. This financial restitution serves as a pivotal resource, providing the means to cover an expansive array of needs crucial to the child's comprehensive recovery and well-being. These encompass not only immediate medical expenses but also encompass therapeutic interventions, essential assistive devices, and educational provisions tailored to the unique requirements posed by the trauma. By seeking such legal recourse, families endeavour to forge a pathway towards recovery, safeguarding their child's future prospects while holding accountable those responsible for the birth trauma's life-altering implications.


Foremost and of paramount importance is the imperative to conduct a thorough investigation to ascertain the origin of birth trauma or associated injuries, determining whether they are a result of medical negligence. The acquisition and preservation of hospital records emerge as a pivotal step, encapsulating a comprehensive record of the care dispensed across the prenatal, labour, and delivery phases. Such inquiries delve into intricate terrains, necessitating meticulous scrutiny of the matter's merits and the enlistment of an array of domain experts.

Upon the confirmation of negligence, the claimant is positioned to initiate formal legal procedures. If the occurrence of medical negligence unfolded within a state-run hospital, an integral step entails notifying the relevant state organ within the purview of Section 3 of the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act (Act No. 40 of 2002) within a six-month window from the point of origin. It's important to note that missing this six-month deadline does not inherently preclude the claimant from pursuing legal action, as avenues for seeking condonation are available.

The legal proceedings subsequently set in motion can span over years in their entirety, encompassing diverse stages vital to the intricate process. Among these are the stages of pleading, wherein parties articulate their respective claims and defenses, and the stage of discovery, wherein pertinent information is disclosed. Central to this progression is the trial stage, wherein the factual and legal contentions are dissected and adjudicated.

The dynamics of legal proceedings are marked by their evolving nature, often punctuated by delays attributed to factors like uncooperative participation of involved parties or legal contentions. These obstacles contribute to the extended timeline that such legal processes can entail. The legal pursuit of justice, while complex, serves as a mechanism through which families can navigate the intricate realm of birth trauma, seeking not only accountability but also the compensation essential for the well-being and rehabilitation of those impacted.


Birth trauma, stemming from instances of medical negligence, can etch profound imprints on the trajectory of both the child and their family's existence. Within this realm of adversity, the pursuit of legal recourse emerges as a potential avenue toward not only rectifying the wrongs but also securing compensation that can serve as a pivotal stepping stone for comprehensive healing. This journey towards justice encompasses not only accountability for the negligence but also the means to access essential resources that are instrumental in ensuring ongoing care for the child and an enhanced quality of life.

A nuanced comprehension of the legal process and the guidance of adept birth injury attorneys can be instrumental in helping families navigate the intricate landscapes of medical negligence cases. This expert guidance empowers families to chart a course through complexities, ultimately striving for the justice that befits their circumstances.

In this pursuit of justice and healing, Adendorff Theron Inc shine as beacons of hope. Drawing upon an extensive wealth of experience in matters related to birthing injuries, Adendorff Theron Inc has meticulously crafted a tailored legal strategy. This strategy encompasses a holistic approach, one that not only seeks justice but also prioritizes the effective and expeditious resolution of litigation. This approach is illuminated by the exploration of alternative dispute resolution methods, such as mediation or arbitration, which can expedite the attainment of resolution and redress.

The distinctive approach undertaken by Adendorff Theron Inc underscores their unwavering focus on seeking justice with both efficiency and effectiveness. This commitment is aligned with their aim to not only provide legal representation but to also serve as partners in a journey that strives for healing, restoration, and the realization of rightful compensation.


Do you have reason to believe that you or a cherished family member has been impacted by medical negligence? Connect with Adendorff Theron Inc. to initiate an examination of your situation. Our cadre of skilled attorneys is perpetually prepared to provide support and navigate you through this journey.

Reaching us is effortless – access our digital business cards at:

Or explore our website at:

Adendorff Theron Inc: Your Guiding Light and Reliable Legal Ally.

The Reasonable Doctor

- Posted in Medical Malpractice by

enter image description here



If a doctor's conduct is found to have fallen short of the standard that the law expects from a reasonable doctor in a particular field of medicine or expertise, considering the specific circumstances, that doctor will be deemed negligent. Put differently, professional negligence by doctors occurs when a patient is harmed because a doctor has not exercised the level of skill and care expected of a reasonably competent doctor in their respective field.


In most cases, a doctor may face a lawsuit under delictual liability, requiring the presence of elements of such liability. If these elements are indeed present, the doctor will be held responsible for the damages resulting from the negligence.


A doctor's conduct will be evaluated against a standard of reasonableness. When applying this standard to the medical profession, it entails the conduct expected of a reasonable medical practitioner given the specific circumstances of the case.

In the case of Van Wyk v Lewis 1924 AD 438, Wessels AJ remarked we should attempt to place ourselves in the exact position the surgeon was in during the specific operation and then ascertain if their actions were characterized by sensible caution or negligence. Moreover, in Michell v Dixon 1924 AD 519, the court determined that a medical practitioner is not obligated to exhibit the utmost level of professional expertise in their cases, but they are required to employ practical skill and care; negligence results in liability for ensuing consequences.

In R v Van der Merwe 1953 2 PH H 124 (W), Roper J noted that negligence, especially regarding a skilled profession like medicine, carries a distinct implication. A professional who practices a skill-based occupation holds themselves as possessing the essential expertise and commits to delivering services with reasonable skill and capability. This is the expected and undertaken obligation, entailing a skill level corresponding to the ordinary proficiency within their profession.

Ultimately, in Goliath v MEC for Health, Eastern Cape 2015 (2) SA 97 (SCA), Ponnan JA explained that deviation from the general skill and diligence exercised by peers in the same professional category would typically amount to negligence. A surgeon is held to the same standards as other professionals.

As pointed out, a medical practitioner is not expected to bring to bear upon the case entrusted to him the highest possible degree of professional skill, but he is bound to employ reasonable skill and care. The central criterion remains whether the practitioner utilized rational skill and care or if their conduct fell below the benchmark of a reasonably competent practitioner in their field.


In conclusion, the concept of professional negligence within the medical field revolves around the pivotal idea that doctors are held to a standard of reasonableness in their conduct. This standard is a yardstick that measures a doctor's actions against the expectations of what a reasonable medical practitioner would do in a similar situation. When a doctor's conduct falls short of this standard and results in harm to a patient, it constitutes professional negligence.

This understanding emphasizes that a doctor's obligation isn't to achieve the pinnacle of professional excellence in every case, but rather to exercise a practical and reasonable level of skill and care in their practice. The legal framework surrounding delictual liability underscores the accountability that doctors face when the essential elements of negligence are present in their actions.

Key legal precedents such as the Van Wyk v Lewis case highlight the importance of placing oneself in the shoes of the medical practitioner, considering the circumstances they faced during a specific medical procedure. The Michell v Dixon case reinforces the notion that practical skill and reasonable care are the cornerstones of a doctor's responsibilities, underscoring the repercussions of negligence.

Moreover, the R v Van der Merwe case introduces the idea that practicing a skilled profession inherently implies a commitment to possessing and applying reasonable expertise. This parallels the insight from Goliath v MEC for Health, Eastern Cape, affirming that a surgeon, like any other professional, is subject to the standards of their peer group and is responsible for employing reasonable skill and care.

Ultimately, the prevailing theme is clear: the medical profession is held to a standard that demands competence and practical care, with deviations from this standard constituting negligence. As medicine advances and patient care remains paramount, the principles established by these legal cases serve as a critical guidepost for maintaining the integrity and accountability of medical practitioners.


Suspect that you or a loved one may have been a victim of medical negligence? Get in touch with Adendorff Theron Inc. We can help investigate your situation. If the medical practitioner(s) failed to meet the standard of care, Adendorff Theron Inc can support you in pursuing justice and the compensation you're entitled to.

Contact us seamlessly by using our digital business cards—just follow the provided link

Seeking Justice for Medical Negligence?

- Posted in Medical Malpractice by

Medical Negligence

Welcome to Adendorff Theron Inc, a distinguished law firm dedicated to representing victims of medical negligence across both private and public sectors. Our extensive expertise and commitment are evident in our unwavering pursuit of justice for our clients.

Why Engage Adendorff Theron Inc?

  • In-depth Expertise: Our profound experience ranges from defending government institutions to representing aggrieved individuals, offering a comprehensive perspective on each case.
  • Bespoke Legal Strategies: We understand that each case is distinct, and our legal solutions are meticulously tailored to ensure favourable outcomes.
  • Steadfast Representation: Our allegiance is unwavering, ensuring that we advocate passionately on your behalf.
  • Strategic Forethought: We adeptly anticipate potential defense tactics and craft compelling counterarguments.
  • A Legacy of Excellence: Our consistent track record underscores our commitment and dedication to every client.

Areas of Specialization:

  • Expertise in representing birth-related negligence cases, notably Cerebral Palsy.
  • Claims related to loss of support or income due to medical negligence.

At Adendorff Theron Inc, we recognize the profound impact of medical negligence on individuals and families. Beyond seeking compensation, we aim to restore dignity and assurance to our clients.

With Adendorff Theron Inc, you are not merely a client; you are the cornerstone of our practice. Every legal strategy we employ is grounded in a profound understanding of your individual circumstances. We are poised to present your case with the rigor, detail, and eloquence it deserves.

Adendorff Theron Inc: A beacon of hope in the complex realm of medical negligence. Entrust us with your journey to justice, and together, we shall prevail.